论文部分内容阅读
本文通过分析认为,由于差序格局的影响、文化传统的制约、依法裁判解决纠纷的不彻底性以及法律自身的不足,依法裁判无法达到“案结”与“事了”而面临正当性危机,阐述了法律与非正式规范存在互动的必要性。本文以此为契机对诉讼调解制度重新解读,认为以合意为正当性依据、保障当事人主体性和自治性的诉讼调解制度能够为法律与非正式规范的互动提供制度平台。在诉讼调解中,法律与非正式规范的互动寓于合意的形成过程中。最后分析了合意形成过程中的瑕疵及其对法律与非正式规范的影响,并提出了改进我国诉讼调解制度的几点浅见。
According to the analysis, due to the influence of the difference pattern, the restriction of the cultural tradition, the incompleteness of resolving disputes according to the law and the inadequacy of the law itself, the legal judgment can not meet the “case” and “the matter” Legitimacy crisis, elaborating the necessity of the interaction between law and informal norms. This article takes this as an opportunity to reinterpret the system of mediation in litigation. It is believed that the system of litigation mediation that takes litigation as justification basis and protects the subjectivity and autonomy of litigants can provide an institutional platform for the interaction between law and informal norms. In the litigation mediation, the interaction between law and informal norms is in the process of forming a desired formation. Finally, it analyzes the flaws in the process of formation of conciliation and its impact on the law and informal norms, and puts forward some humble opinions on how to improve our system of lawsuit mediation.