本文从唐授杜甫左拾遗告身的相关文献记载,告身敕词、御宝与唐代皇帝的直接授官,唐授官制敕格式有不书原官职之例,唐有行在官名称之例,以及唐宋元明有关伪造制敕之刑法规定等方面,考察唐授杜甫左拾遗告身的真伪,提出杜甫告身是真品,而非洪业先生所说的“赝品”。 This article from the Tang Du Fu left to pick up the body of the relevant literature records, suicide suicide note, Yu Bao and direct emperors of the Tang Dynasty, the official format of the Tang dynasty government officials do not have the original case, the name of Tang Youhang official name, and Tang, Yuan and Ming dynasties about the criminal law of forgery, and so on, examining the authenticity of the Du Xun’s left pick in the Tang dynasty, and proposing that Du Fu sue itself as a genuine one instead of the “counterfeit” alleged by Mr. Hung Yip.