语文教学重在研究教什么,还是怎样教?这是一个有争议的问题。一般来说争议的问题总要经过“正—反—合”三个阶段。传统的教育学理论认为教什么比怎么教更重要,而《学习的革命》一书则认为我们怎么教比教什么重要得多。合题就是加强课程改革,现在的课程把教什么和怎么教都包容进去,统一起来。这里刊发的一组文章也是一组有争议的文章,如果说李仁甫、杨邦俊的观点是正,那么杨斌、周富兴、黄厚江的观点就是反,那么“合”的观点是什么?合其实不是简单的加减法,而应该是深入其中之后的一种超越,人们常常在做合题,假如这个合题由你来做,你会怎么做?程红兵 The language teaching focuses on what to teach and how to teach it. This is a controversial issue. In general, controversial issues always go through three stages of “positive-negative-consistent”. Traditional pedagogical theories believe that teaching is more important than how to teach it, and the book “The Revolution of Learning” thinks that how we teach is much more important than teaching. The conjunctive issue is to strengthen the curriculum reform. The current curriculum incorporates what to teach and how to teach it and unite it. The group of articles published here is also a group of controversial articles. If the views of Li Renxuan and Yang Bangjun are positive, the views of Yang Bin, Zhou Fuxing, and Huang Houjiang are opposite. What is the view of “combination”? Actually, it is not simple. Addition and subtraction, but it should be a kind of transcendence after it goes deeper, people often do collaborative questions, and if this question is done by you, what would you do? Cheng Hongbing