论文部分内容阅读
在所有制形式上,应冲出传统“公有制”的束缚,探索多种所有制形式。对这一问题,不少人认为:社会主义特征就是生产资料公有制,他们把国家拨款搞科研和“吃皇粮”与公有制、与社会主义等同起来。比如,象北京中关村科学城中那样业绩辉煌的科技实业企业,至今仍有人否定其是社会主义企业。可见,所有制问题已是困扰科技实业发展不可忽视的问题。所有制问题是社会主义国家进行体制改革中的一个十分关键而又十分敏感的问题。要使科技实业得到更快、更健康地发展,我们必须冲破传统公有制观念的束缚,积极而又大胆地探索符合我国国情的所有制形式。给予社会主义所有制注入新的内容,增加新的活力和生机。首先,我们应当充分认识社会主义初级阶段是多种所有制并存,多种经济成份协调发展的社会主义,尤其是提倡大力发展个体、私有制经济,给社会主义公有制经济以必要的补充。因此,科技实业体即使是属于私营企业,不是公有制,在我国相当长一段时期内仍允许其生存,并需要不断有所发展。其次,社会主义公有制不是“吃皇粮”、吃“大锅饭”的公
In the form of ownership, we should break out of the shackles of traditional “public ownership” and explore multiple forms of ownership. On this issue, many people think that the characteristics of socialism are the public ownership of the means of production. They equate national funding for scientific research and “eating imperial grain” with public ownership and socialism. For example, as a technology industrial enterprise with brilliant performance as in the Zhongguancun Science City in Beijing, some people still reject it as a socialist enterprise. It can be seen that the ownership issue has been a problem that cannot be ignored in the development of science and technology industry. The issue of ownership is a very critical and very sensitive issue in the socialist countries’ system reform. To make science and technology industries develop faster and healthier, we must break through the shackles of the traditional concept of public ownership and actively and boldly explore ownership forms that are in line with China’s national conditions. Give new content to socialist ownership and increase new vitality and vitality. First of all, we should fully understand that the primary stage of socialism is the coexistence of multiple ownership systems and the coordinated development of various economic components. In particular, we must encourage the development of individual and private ownership economies and supplement the socialist public ownership economy. Therefore, even if it is a private enterprise, it is not a public ownership system. It is still allowed in China for a long period of time, and it needs continuous development. Second, the socialist public ownership system is not a “meal of the imperial family” and a “big pot of rice.”