星巴克没有在故宫的建筑上做招牌,只在窗户上写了店名,也并不显眼,所以不能说它破坏了故宫的文物;但星巴克作为一个文化符号,它在故宫的存在深深刺痛了一些人的神经。星巴克是否要撤出故宫的话题之所以被人们关注,是因为人们把星巴克和故宫视为两种文化的代表,把一个看似不起眼的商业租赁问题放大到传统文化精华如何对待外来大众文化侵入的高度。 Starbucks did not sign on the building of the Forbidden City, wrote its name on the window, and was not conspicuous, so it can not be said that it damaged the artifacts of the Forbidden City. However, as a cultural symbol, Starbucks stung deeply in the Forbidden City Some people's nerves. The reason why Starbucks is going to withdraw from the Forbidden City is a topic of concern because people regard Starbucks and the Forbidden City as representatives of the two cultures and amplify a seemingly insignificant issue of commercial leasing to how the essence of traditional culture treats foreign popular culture intrusion the height of.