论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析和探讨采用神经阻滞与加巴喷丁对带状疱疹后神经痛患者进行临床治疗的情况及效果。方法:随机抽选2011年10月-2014年10月期间,曲靖市第一人民医院接收的82例带状疱疹后神经痛患者。按照抽签法对他们进行随机平均分组,即:对照组41例,采用单纯神经阻滞进行诊治;观察组41例,采用神经阻滞与加巴喷丁进行诊治,并就两组患者的临床诊疗情况进行统计学比较和分析。结果:临床比较统计显示,观察组患者在视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、临床总有效率(97.56%)以及不良反应率(0%)方面均明显优于对照组患者(78.05%,9.76%),组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:采用神经阻滞与加巴喷丁对带状疱疹后神经痛患者进行临床治疗的效果显著,其疼痛缓解明显,治愈率高,不良反应率低,因此,它是一种科学、有效、理想的临床诊疗方法。
Objective: To analyze and discuss the clinical treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia with nerve block and gabapentin. Methods: A total of 82 patients with postherpetic neuralgia received by Qujing First People’s Hospital from October 2011 to October 2014 were randomly selected. According to the random sampling method, they were randomly divided into groups: control group, 41 cases were treated by simple nerve block; observation group, 41 cases were treated by nerve block and gabapentin, and the clinical diagnosis and treatment of both groups were statistically Compare and analyze. Results: Compared with the control group (78.05%, 9.76%) in the observation group, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, clinical total effective rate (97.56%) and adverse reaction rate (0% , The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Nerve blockade and gabapentin are effective in clinical treatment of patients with post-herpetic neuralgia. The pain relief is obvious, the cure rate is high and the rate of adverse reaction is low. Therefore, it is a scientific, effective and ideal clinical Diagnosis and treatment methods.