论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院发布的指导案例:桦林轮胎有限公司(简称:桦林轮胎)诉沈阳汽车制造厂(简称:沈阳汽车)的轮胎买卖合同纠纷案,是一起债权人失败的案例,而分析此案例,对律师办理类似案例有着重要的借鉴意义。本案基本案情:沈阳汽车购买桦林轮胎总价为1064万元的轮胎,桦林轮胎如约履行了供货义务,沈阳汽车支付部分货款后,在尚欠近800万元货款的情况下,进行了资产重组。沈阳汽车将其全部经营性资产抵偿对其母公司沈阳金杯股份有限公司(简称:金杯股份)的3.1亿元负
The Supreme People’s Court issued a guidance case: Hualin Tire Co., Ltd. (Abbreviation: Hualin Tire) v. Shenyang Automotive Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (referred to as Shenyang Automobile) tire sale contract dispute is a case of creditor failure, and analysis of this case, The case of lawyers for the case of an important reference. The basic case of this case: Shenyang Automobile to buy tires totaling 10.64 million yuan Hualin tires, Hualin Tires, such as about the fulfillment of the obligation to supply, Shenyang Automobile to pay part of the purchase price, in the case of less than nearly 800 million purchase price, carried out Asset restructuring. Shenyang Motor Co., Ltd. will offset all its operating assets to its parent company Shenyang Gold Cup Co., Ltd. (short: JinBei shares) of 3.1 billion negative