论文部分内容阅读
英美两国之所以在历史上较为青睐于对抗式刑事审判方式是因为英美两国具有不同于法德等国的政治法律文化基础:古典自由主义。古典自由主义与对抗式刑事审判具有内在的契合性。随着古典自由主义的式微和新自由主义的兴起,英美的古典型对抗式刑事审判慢慢地转变为现代型对抗式刑事审判。现代型对抗式刑事审判不仅通过福利性的法律援助制度逐渐消除了古典型对抗式刑事审判形式平等实质不平等的弊端,还通过建立和完善证据开示制度实现了控辩双方的资源互享并在一定程度上增强了审判发现实质真实的能力,而且还重新设定了刑事审判控辩审三方的角色和相互关系,如强调检察官的公正执法义务、对被告人自治权的适当限制、裁判者对程序的适度干预。
The reason why the Anglo-American countries favor the adversarial criminal trial in history is that the Anglo-American countries have the political, legal and cultural foundation different from France and Germany: classical liberalism. Classical liberalism and adversarial criminal trials are inherently compatible. With the decline of classical liberalism and the rise of neoliberalism, the Anglo-American classic antitrust criminal trial slowly transformed into modern-type antitrust criminal trial. Modern confrontational criminal trial not only gradually eliminated the shortcomings of the substantive inequality of equality in the form of the classic confrontational criminal trial through the system of welfare legal aid, but also achieved the mutual sharing of resources between prosecutors and defenders through the establishment and improvement of the evidence discovery system To a certain extent, enhanced the ability of the trial to find out the real thing, and also redefined the roles and relationships of the three parties involved in the trial and adjudication of criminal trials, such as emphasizing the prosecutor’s fair law enforcement obligations, proper restrictions on the defendant’s autonomy, Moderate intervention in the program.