论文部分内容阅读
本文运用新古典经济学理论,研究并比较研究型合资企业和技术许可贸易功能。研究发现,这两种合作研发模式都有利于增加消费者剩余,提高社会福利水平。研究型合资企业还有助于分摊研发成本,分散创新风险,整合社会资源;但许可协议却增加了研发投入资本,不利于激励企业技术创新,还有可能引起共商。最终从合同理论的角度,比较分析技术许可协议“固定费用+提成费”的技术转移费用条款对技术合同执行效果的影响,同时通过博弈理论阐述研究型合资企业隐性契约的自组织功能,从而得出研究型合资企业是更有利于技术创新效果和技术扩散,更具契约约束力的企业合作研发优选模式的结论。
This article uses neoclassical economics theory to study and compare research-based joint ventures and technology licensing trade functions. The study found that these two cooperative research and development models are conducive to increasing consumer surplus and raising the level of social welfare. Research-based joint ventures also help to allocate R & D costs, diversify innovation risks and integrate social resources; however, licensing agreements increase the capital invested in research and development, which is not conducive to stimulating technological innovation in enterprises and may also lead to business negotiations. Finally, from the perspective of contract theory, this paper analyzes the impact of the technology transfer fee clause of the technology license agreement “fixed fee + royalty ” on the execution effect of the technology contract, at the same time expounds the self-organization function of the implicit contract of the research joint venture through the game theory , And concluded that research-based joint ventures are more conducive to technological innovation effects and technology diffusion, more contractual binding business cooperation research and development of the preferred mode of conclusion.