联邦法院(第八民事审判庭)1976年11月24日《德国最高法院民事判例集》第67卷第359页,《新法学周刊》1977年第379页《法学家报》1977年第343页(M Lieb和B Rengier的评论,以及《保险法》1977年第358页)事实D公司,是一家为变压器生产锡制盖子的制造商,由原告公司承保。而被告生产用于工业产品的清洁脱脂设备。该设备通过加热蒸发,将全氯乙烯油从被清洗部分清洗出去。连接开关的浮球阀,被告声称是由一家国外供应商提供,可以防止通常被液体覆盖的灯丝暴露在空气中。 Federal Court of Justice (Eighth Civil Trial Division) 24 November 1976 Civil Servant of the German Supreme Court Volume 67, page 359, New Jurisprudence Week 1977, p. 379, Jurists, 1977, p. 343 (Comments by M Lieb and B Rengier, and Insurance Act, 1977, p. 358) Facts D Company, a maker of tin caps for transformers, is covered by the plaintiffs company. The defendant produces cleaning degreasing equipment for industrial products. The equipment evaporates by heating and clears the vinyl chloride oil from the part to be cleaned. Float valve connected to the switch, the defendant claimed to have been supplied by an overseas supplier to prevent the normally liquid-covered filament from being exposed to the air.