作为一门研究意义的理论哲学,阐释学译学的反思与建构是伴随阐释学理论的更新而不断生发出新意义的过程。讨论阐释学译学的超越性及其理论建构必然离不开对19世纪以来阐释学发展的理论谱系的梳理。从19世纪上半叶德国哲学家施莱尔马赫提出并发展阐释学以来,翻译界对于阐释学理论的引介就从未停止过。阐释学中(尤其是哲学阐释学)的前理解、效果历史、视域融合等概念从最初的浪漫主义阐释学到哲学阐释学阶段,对于翻译学的发展都起到过至关重要的作用。事实上,阐释学与翻译学的钩连最基本之处在于如何理解除了表面意义之外的文化和思维的差异,较为恰当地理解本来语言的原意,准确地翻译出来并很好地表达出来。这个过程看似简单实则复杂异常。至20世纪下半叶,斯坦纳创造性地提出“理解即 As a theoretical philosophy of research significance, the interpretation and construction of translation studies are the process of continuously giving birth to new meaning with the updating of hermeneutics theory. To discuss and interpret the transcendence of translatology and its theoretical construction is inseparable from the theoretical pedigree of the development of hermeneutics since the 19th century. Since the introduction and development of hermeneutics by the German philosopher Schleiermacher in the first half of the 19th century, the translation community has never ceased introducing the theory of hermeneutics. The concepts of pre-understanding, especially philosophical hermeneutics, the concepts of effect history and horizon fusion have played a crucial role in the development of translation studies from initial romantic hermeneutics to philosophical hermeneutics. In fact, the most basic connection between hermeneutics and translation studies lies in how to understand the difference between cultures and minds other than superficial meanings. It is relatively proper to understand the original intention of the original language, accurately translate it, and express it well. This process may seem simple but complex exception. By the second half of the twentieth century, Steiner creatively proposed ”understanding