论文部分内容阅读
中国书法史上,历来晋唐书法相提并论,后人学书,多从魏晋钟王、唐代颜柳入手。但若翻阅历代名家书论,“唐书不如晋书”之论调时常可见,如蔡襄《论书》:“书法惟风韵难及。虞书多粗糙,晋人书,虽非名家亦自奕奕,有一种风流蕴藉之气。缘当时人物,以清简相尚,虚旷为怀,修容法语,以韵相胜,落华散藻,自然可观。可以精神解领,不可以言语求觅也。”[1]苏轼:“予尝论书,以谓钟王之迹萧散简远,妙在笔墨之外。至唐颜柳,始集古今笔法而尽发之,极书之便,天下翕然以为宗师,而钟王之法益微。”[2]可见宋代蔡襄和苏轼对唐书不如晋书持有相同看法。米芾有“草书不入晋人格,徒成下品”之说,他对唐代书法攻击最为严厉:
In the history of Chinese calligraphy, the calligraphy of the Jin Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty have always been compared with one another. However, if you look through ancient famous book reviews, “Tang book is not as good as Jin book,” the argument is often seen, such as Cai Xiang “Book of Ones”: “calligraphy but difficult and difficult. Also from the self-paced, there is a style of romantic implied Qi. At the time of the characters, with simple and honest still, Xu Kuaihuai, Xun Rong French, rhyme phase wins, scattered scattered algae, natural and considerable. See also. ”[1] Su Shi: “ to try the book, that the trace of the king of the king Xiao scattered casual, wonderful in the pen and ink .Tang Yan, beginning with the ancient and modern brushwork and make it, Then, the world suddenly thought that the master, and the king of the law benefits micro. ”[2] shows the Song DynastyCai Xiang and Su Shi on the Tang book as good as hold the same view. Misaki has “cursive into the Jin style, just into the next product,” said, he was the most severe calligraphy attacks on the Tang Dynasty: