从论文中某些概念与权威工具书不一致、期刊编辑不够熟悉有关专业知识、论文作者行文表述不够清楚、论文作者统计方法选用不当、论文审稿者审稿不严谨等角度,给出了编辑对科技学术期刊有疑难问题的论文处理的实证,并作了简要分析。 From the point of inconsistency between some of the concepts in the dissertation and authoritative reference books, lack of familiarity with the journal editors, lack of clarity in the formulation of the essay’s author’s writing, improper selection of the statistical methods of the dissertation authors, and lack of rigorous review by the dissertation reviewer, Scientific and technical journals have difficult problems dealing with empirical evidence, and made a brief analysis.