在对第二国际的研讨中,有的同志提出了这样的见解:伯恩施坦主义不是修正主义;它是适应资本主义发展的新情况,对当时较为发达的资本主义国家如何实现社会主义所进行的一种探讨,是一种新选择,也可以说是一种“新思维”;今天看来,是合理的、有价值的,从一定意义上讲,是对马克思主义的补充、发展。我认为,这种看法是不正确的,值得商榷。伯恩施坦提出的所谓新选择的理论依据是错误的认为伯恩施坦主义是实现社会主义道路的新选择(以下简称新选择)的同志,列出的依 In the seminar on the Second International, some comrades put forward the view that: Bernsteinism is not revisionism; it is a new situation that adapts to the development of capitalism, and how socialism was carried out by the more developed capitalist countries at that time Is a new choice or a “new way of thinking.” Today, it is reasonable and valuable, and in a certain sense, it is a supplement to Marxism. I think this view is incorrect and it is open to question. The theoretical basis for the so-called new choice put forward by Bernstein is that he mistakenly thinks that Bernsteinism is a comrade listed as a new option for the realization of the socialist road (hereinafter referred to as the new option)