论文部分内容阅读
可能有人以为,这个题目写反了。其实没有。如果现在有人问我对“要不要孩子”这个问题的看法,我最简单的说法是,生养孩子是大自然赋予我们的最原始、最基本的权利,若是主动放弃了它,我们既失去了自然,又失去了历史。一个既放弃了自然,又放弃了历史的人,会是什么样子呢?他起码是不完善的。他会是一个真正意义上的“孤儿”。他永远不可能理解他的父母,也不可能真正认识他自己。他的生命只存在于他活着的那段时间,而不能向过去和未来两个维度伸展。大自然赐给我们一个孩子,其实也是赐给我们一
Some people may think that this problem is wrong. In fact, no. If people now ask me the question of whether to have children or not, my simplest formulation is that giving birth to children is the most primitive and basic right that nature has given us. If we give up on the initiative, we both lose Naturally, it lost its history. What would one look like of a man who gave up both nature and history? He is imperfect at least. He will be a true “orphan”. He can never understand his parents, nor can he really know him. His life only exists in the period of his life, but can not be extended to the past and future dimensions. Nature gave us a child, but it is actually given to us