“理”是朱子思想中的一个核心概念。自朱子理学在元代被确立为官方哲学以来,学者尤其是现代学者对“理”的诠释存在着严重分岐。这一方面是因朱子哲学体系自身存在的矛盾引起的,更重要的是因现代学者多在西方学术背景下对朱子的误读引起的,这使得我们对朱子之“理”的解读的分岐不是缩小了,而是加大了。现代学者对朱子之“理”的诠释主要是从两种视角展开的,一种是西方哲学之逻辑分析视角,一种是道德形而上学之超越视角。逻辑视角的诠释虽然使“理”的概念获得清晰的现代表达,但却因其是纯形式的逻辑抽象,丧失了道德动源的功能和作用。道德视角下的诠释虽然固守了心体本体的立场。但却有与客观世界隔绝的流弊。 “Reason ” is a core concept in Zhu’s thought. Since Zhu’s Neo-Confucianism was established as official philosophy in the Yuan Dynasty, scholars, especially modern scholars, have serious disagreements on the interpretation of “Li ”. On the one hand, this is caused by the contradictions existing in the philosophical system of Zhu Zi and more importantly due to the misunderstanding of Zhu Zi by modern scholars mostly in the western academic background, which makes our interpretation of Zhu Zi’s “Li” Differentiation is not reduced, but increased. The modern scholars ’interpretations of Zhu’s ’ s “reasoning ” are mainly from two perspectives, one is the logical analysis perspective of western philosophy and the other is the transcendence perspective of moral metaphysics. Although the logical interpretation of perspective gives a clear and modern expression of the concept of “Reason ”, it loses its function and function as a purely logical abstraction. Although the interpretation of moral perspective sticks to the body of the body’s position. However, there are some drawbacks that are isolated from the objective world.