论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较5种成年女性人体体表面积计算模型的差异,从中选择相对最适宜的计算模型。方法:依据浙江省丽水市2005年国民体质监测数据库中成年女性的身高、体重等指标,运用5种计算模型计算其体表面积,并进行F方差分析检验。结果:5种模型计算的体表面积(m2)值,经F方差分析检验,模型1与模型2、模型1与模型3、模型1与模型4、模型2与模型3、模型2与模型4、模型2与模型5、模型3与模型5之间,差异性显著(P<0.05);模型1与模型5、模型3与模型4之间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。依据5种人体体表面积计算模型所计算出的∑rij值的大小排序,依次是模型4、模型5、模型2、模型3、模型1。结论:模型4相对较为符合当代成年女性体表面积的计算。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences of human body surface area calculation models in five adult women and to choose the relatively optimal calculation model. Methods: According to the body height and weight of adult female in 2005 National Physical Fitness Monitoring Database in Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, five kinds of calculation models were used to calculate the body surface area of the female body and the F-test of variance was used. Results: The body surface area (m2) values calculated by the five models were tested by F-ANOVA. Models 1 and 2, Models 1 and 3, Models 1 and 4, Models 2 and 3, Models 2 and 4, The difference between model 2 and model 5, model 3 and model 5 was significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between model 1 and model 5, model 3 and model 4 (P> 0.05). According to the five human body surface area calculation model calculated Σrij value size order, followed by model 4, model 5, model 2, model 3, model 1. Conclusion: Model 4 is relatively more in line with the calculation of body surface area of contemporary women.