审稿是编辑工作的决定性环节,毫无疑问这一环节的完成是需要一个周期的。对学术期刊而言(本文以数学期刊为例),过长的审稿周期至少会带来以下三种弊端:1)造成期刊“出版时滞”。目前,科技期刊界都用“出版时滞性”来衡量论文的发表速度,在期刊评优时把“出版时滞”作为参考条件 Reviewing the draft is a decisive part of the editorial work. There is no doubt that the completion of this phase will take one cycle. For academic journals (in this paper, mathematical journals, for example), the lengthy manuscript review cycle brings with it at least the following three drawbacks: 1) causing the publication to be “delayed in publication.” At present, the science and technology periodicals all use the “time lag of publication” to measure the speed of publication of papers, and take “publishing time lag” as the reference condition