论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨介入治疗在产后出血的应用临床效果。方法选取我院2007年1月-2012年6月入院治疗的104例产后出血为研究对象,针对不同手术后的相关指标进行比较分析。结果两组患者实施不同治疗方法的麻醉时间和手术时间比较,介入组均优于手术组,且P均<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。两组患者手术后第1次月经恢复时间及产后月经周期比较,P均>0.05,差异无统计学意义。结论在临床治疗产后出血的过程中,介入治疗方法优点突出、临床实际效果显著。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of interventional therapy in postpartum hemorrhage. Methods 104 cases of postpartum hemorrhage hospitalized in our hospital from January 2007 to June 2012 were selected as the research object, and comparative analysis was made on the relevant indexes after different operations. Results The anesthesia time and operation time of the two groups of patients with different treatment methods were better than those of the operation group, P <0.05, the difference was statistically significant. The first menstruation recovery time and the postpartum menstrual cycle in both groups were significantly different (P> 0.05), but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion In the process of clinical treatment of postpartum hemorrhage, the advantages of interventional therapy are prominent, and the clinical actual results are remarkable.