论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨分析综合护理干预对冠心病患者临床疗效的影响,为冠心病患者的治疗提供科学支持和理论指导。方法选取我院2015年1月至2016年8月接受治疗的冠心病患者100例,将其分为两组,对照组和实验组,每组50人,其中对对照组的冠心病患者进行常规心血管药物治疗和护理,对实验组的冠心病患者在对照组基础上再实施综合护理干预,包括对冠心病患者进行健康教育、患者的生活护理、日用饮食指导、患者运动锻炼、对患者进行心理护理,出院指导记录两组冠心病患者在治疗期间的数据,对两组患者的心绞痛、心率、收缩率病发情况进行对比分析以及患者的住院时间。结果实验组冠心病患者经过综合护理后心率(97.32±13.9)、收缩压(22.42±2.12)均优于对照组冠心病患者经过综合护理后心率(74.59±12.90)、收缩压(20.21±1.32),(P<0.05),差异具有统计学意义;实验组50例冠心病患者心绞痛为16例,百分比为32%,全部低于于对照组50例冠心病患者心绞痛为27例,百分比为54%,差异具有统计学意义,(P<0.05)。结论在临床上,对冠心病患者进行治疗时,再实施综合护理干预,对冠心病患者造成的伤害较小,较为安全,且有效提高冠心病患者治疗心率和收缩压,减少心绞痛发生情况,冠心病患者的依从性也高,值得在临床上推广应用。
Objective To investigate the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the clinical efficacy of patients with coronary heart disease and to provide scientific support and theoretical guidance for the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease. Methods A total of 100 CHD patients treated in our hospital from January 2015 to August 2016 were selected and divided into two groups: control group and experimental group, with 50 patients in each group. Among them, CHD patients in control group were treated routinely Cardiovascular drug treatment and nursing, the experimental group of patients with coronary heart disease in the control group based on the implementation of comprehensive nursing intervention, including the health education for patients with coronary heart disease, the patient’s life care, diet guidance, patient exercise, Conducted psychological care, discharge guidance to record the data of two groups of patients with coronary heart disease during the treatment, angina pectoris, heart rate, contractile rate of the two groups were compared and the patient’s hospitalization time. Results The heart rate (97.32 ± 13.9) and systolic blood pressure (22.42 ± 2.12) in patients with coronary heart disease in the experimental group were all better than those in the control group after heart rate (74.59 ± 12.90) and systolic blood pressure (20.21 ± 1.32) (P <0.05). The difference was statistically significant. In the experimental group, the angina pectoris in the 50 patients with coronary heart disease was 16 (32%), all of which were lower than that of the control group (50 patients) with angina pectoris in 27 patients (54% , The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions Clinically, when carrying out comprehensive nursing intervention on patients with coronary heart disease, it will cause less harm to patients with coronary heart disease and is safer. It can effectively improve heart rate and systolic blood pressure in patients with coronary heart disease and reduce the incidence of angina pectoris. Patients with heart disease compliance is also high, it is worth to promote the clinical application.