论文部分内容阅读
随着课程改革的开展,为了强化学生创新意识,鼓励学生各抒己见,最近二年来,全国各地中考试卷中开放性阅读题不断出现,并有逐步增多的趋势。开放性阅读题尊重学生个性化的阅读体验,促进学生多元化的思维,为语文教学带来了一股春风,这是有目共睹的。但在具体的阅卷过程中,往往会出现两种不良的倾向,即“开放性阅读试题答案的不开放”和“开放性阅读试题答案的全放开”,而各地中考试卷的答案中,对这类试题的答案往往以四个字——“合理即可”了事。何为“合理”?是合学生的理,还是合老师的理,抑或是合文章(含题目)的理?批改开放性阅读
With the implementation of the curriculum reform, in order to strengthen the students’ sense of innovation and encourage students to express their opinions, in the past two years, the open reading questions in the national examination papers have been continuously appearing and have gradually increased. The open reading question respects students’ individualized reading experience, promotes students’ diversified thinking, and brings a spring breeze to language teaching. This is obvious to all. However, in the course of a specific reading process, there are often two unhealthy tendencies, namely, “opening of answers to open reading questions” and “opening of answers to open reading questions”, and in the answers of local examination papers, Answers to such questions often take four words - “reasonable”. What is “reasonable”? Is it a student’s reason, or a teacher’s reason, or is it a combination of articles (including topics)? Correcting open reading