论文部分内容阅读
20 0 3年是湖北省实行税费改革 ,取消共同生产费后的第一年。之前在共同生产费名义下收取的灌溉水费 ,改由以村民小组为单位成立的农户用水协会收取。 2 0 0 3年夏 ,湖北省荆门市一个村民小组在收取灌溉水费的时候 ,发生了这样一件事情 :在五月底收取亩平 2 0元的抽水费时 ,有 3户农户因为自家农田在水渠边上可以搭便车 ,没有缴纳抽水费。到了七月底 ,因持续干旱 ,需要每亩再收取 1 0元抽水费 ,如此就可以将所有稻田灌溉一遍 ,确保全年稻谷丰收。但村民们要求欠交农户补足上次欠交的抽水费 ,否则拒绝交款。而欠款农户则只同意缴这一次的抽水费 ,不愿补缴前次所欠水款。用水协会费尽九牛二虎之力 ,不能调平分歧 ,最终不能收上抽水费 ,致使守在泵站边上的农户们眼看着到手的稻谷被旱死。据农民自己算账说 ,因为这次没有抽成水 ,亩平至少减产 2 0 %,有的农田基本绝收。按当地亩均水稻 1 5 0 0斤的产量来计算 ,减产 2 0 %也就是亩均大约减少 1 5 0元的纯收入。附近的数十个村民小组普遍存在如上问题。用 1 0元的抽水费换来 1 5 0元的收入 ,显然是十分合算的 ,即使少数农户不愿出钱抽水 ,只要大多数农民愿意多分摊一点钱 ,也能将水抽上来 ,所有人的损失都能避免 ,而且对于他们自己也依然划算 ,为什么他们宁可
In 2003, Hubei Province implemented the reform of taxes and fees and canceled the first co-production fee. The irrigation water fee previously charged under the name of co-production fee will be charged to the water user association established by the villager group as a unit. In the summer of 2003, when a group of villagers in Jingmen City, Hubei Province, charged irrigation water charges, one such thing happened when receiving a pumping fee of 20 yuan per mu at the end of May when three farmer households The edge of the ditch can be free ride, did not pay pumping fees. By the end of July, due to the prolonged drought, another 10 yuan of pumping fee per mu will be charged, so that all paddy fields can be irrigated again to ensure the full-year paddy harvest. However, the villagers demanded payment of the fees owed by the farmers to make up for the last payment, or refused to pay the bills. The arrears farmers only agreed to pay this time the pumping fees, unwilling to make up the last owed money. Water Association exhausted, unable to balance the differences, and ultimately can not close the pumping fees, resulting in the side of the pump station farmers are watching the hand of rice was drunk. According to the peasants’ own account, since this time there was no pumping into the water, the output of Muping was reduced by at least 20%. Some of the farmland basically took over. Calculated on the basis of the output of 1500 kg of mu of rice per mu in the region, a decrease of 20% of the net income will be about RMB 150 yuan per mu. The dozens of nearby villagers groups generally have the above problems. It is obviously very cost-effective to pay $ 150 for the pumping fee of $ 10. Even if a small number of peasants are unwilling to pay for pumping water, as long as most peasants are willing to allocate a little extra money, they can also pump up the water and all the people Of the losses can be avoided, but also for their own still cost-effective, why they prefer