论文部分内容阅读
清初内廷与皇家林苑内均未设中和堂,皇家林苑中和堂的设置要晚至嘉庆朝,故无法以此证实康熙“中和堂”款瓷器就是官窑器。文献上有关中和堂的记载亦与康熙官窑器没有关联。相反,从康熙“中和堂”款瓷器的来源、明末清初堂名款瓷器的流行、清初官民窑瓷器的烧造及康熙“中和堂”款瓷器的造型、釉彩、纹样、款识特徵分析,“中和堂”款瓷器不是官窑器,而是康熙早期上乘民窑作品。
Nei Ting and Royal Court in the early Qing Dynasty Court have not set Zhonghe Tang, Royal Garden Court and Zhonglin Hall set to late Jiaqing North Korea, it can not be confirmed Kangxi “Zhonghentang ” porcelain is the kiln. The records of Zhonghetang in the literature are also not related to Kangxi Official Kiln. On the contrary, from the Kangxi “Zhonghentang” porcelain source, the late Ming and early Qing dynasties famous porcelain popular, early Qing Dynasty civil kiln porcelain firing and Kangxi “Zhonghentang” porcelain modeling, glaze , Pattern, section feature analysis, “Zhonghengtang ” section of porcelain is not a kiln, but Kangxi early superior kiln works.