论文部分内容阅读
国内传统刑法因果关系过于关注事实因素,且层次单一,影响渎职犯罪因果关系认定。英美法系与大陆法系因果关系的双层次认定模式对构建我国渎职犯罪因果关系模式有积极的借鉴意义。因果关系仅是连接渎职行为与危害结果的桥梁,在吸收国外双层次认定模式合理内核外,还应扬弃国外法律因果关系中“归责”因素,以期与国内犯罪构成兼容。在具体的渎职犯罪中,应先运用条件关系进行事实因果关系判断,再进行法律因果关系判断,综合考虑危害结果的严重程度、渎职行为对危害结果所起作用的大小、行为人职责的相关性等要素,筛选出具有刑法意义上的因果关系。
Domestic traditional criminal law is too concerned about the causal relationship between the factual factors, and a single level, affecting the causality of dereliction of duty identified. The double determination of the causation between the Anglo - American legal system and the civil law system has a positive reference for building the causal model of dereliction of duty in our country. Causality is only a bridge connecting the dereliction of duty and the result of the harm. Absorbing the reasonable core of the dual-level identification model in foreign countries, we should also abandon the factor of “blame” in the causal relationship of foreign law so as to be compatible with the domestic crimes. In specific crimes of dereliction of duty, we should first use the conditional relationship to judge the factual causality, and then judge the legal causation, considering the seriousness of the harmful result, the effect of the dereliction of duty on the endangering result and the correlation of the duty of the perpetrator And other factors, screening out the causal relationship with the meaning of criminal law.