自谢冕教授主编的《百年中国文学经典》出版以后,有关经典之战轰炒一时,至今其笔墨文案仍断断续续出现在文坛大小报刊上。而谢冕教授等人也因此一时陷入四面楚歌的尴尬困境,其中抨击的焦点主要落在两个方面:一是此套丛书出现两种版本;另一个则将矛头指向他们世纪末择选文学这一行为本身,认为经典不是选出来的,而是历史沉淀、堆积出来的,笔者在此仅就后一个焦点问题略抒己见。在中国古代,文学经典常与权威联系在一 Since the publishing of the “Centennial Chinese Literary Classics”, which was edited by Professor Xie Mian, the scriptures of the classic war have been booming for so long. Up to now, their pen and ink creations have been intermittently appeared in newspapers and magazines of the literary world. Professor Xie Mian and others temporarily fell into a embattled embattled predicament, in which the criticism mainly falls into two aspects: First, there are two versions of the series; the other one is going to target them at the end of the century to choose the type of literature In itself, that the classic is not selected, but the history of precipitation, accumulation, the author here only to focus on a matter of opinion express their views. In ancient China, literary classics were often linked to authority