论文部分内容阅读
1995年秋天,我去拜访刘玉凯先生,从谈话中得知他正在搞鲁迅与钱钟书比较研究,心中不免暗暗为他担心。这个题目写不好易成空泛之论,若要写出特色,又谈何容易。鲁迅和钱钟是举世公认的文学大师,把二人放在一起研究且写成专著,当时觉得多少有些冒险。三年后当我读完他的《鲁迅钱钟书平行论》,心中一快石头落地:这部书写成功了。对鲁迅和钱钟书的研究不仅是文学现象,而且是当代重要的文化现象,对这两位大师的研究,成果可说是不胜枚举,要是偷懒耍滑四平八稳东摘西凑,当然不会有人对作者批评指责。因为说平稳的话,讲人所共的大道理,是文章的长寿之道,也是当前学术界积重难返的现实。但是,不客气地说.这也是文章的寿终正寝之境,是“木乃伊”工程。学术研究贵独
In the autumn of 1995, I went to visit Mr. Liu Yukai and learned from the conversation that he was engaged in a comparative study of Lu Xun and Qian Zhongshu, and he could not help secretly worrying about him. This topic is not easy to write a hollow theory, to write features, easier said than done. Lu Xun and Qian Zhong are universally acknowledged masters of literature, putting the two together to study and write monographs, and at that time, they felt somewhat risky. Three years later, when I finished reading his book, “Parallelism of Qian and Qian in Luxun”, a quick stone fell to the ground: the writing was successful. The research on Lu Xun and Qian Zhongshu is not only a literary phenomenon, but also an important cultural phenomenon of our time. The research on these two masters can be said to be numerous in scope. Criticize the author Because it is stable, speaking the truth of the common people, is the longevity of the article, but also the reality of the current academic difficulties. But, you’re kind of saying this is the end of the story, the “mummy” project. Academic research expensive alone