论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察体外冲击波治疗鹅足肌腱炎的远期疗效。方法:选择临床确诊的鹅足肌腱炎146例,随机分为观察组和对照组各73例;观察组采用放射状体外冲击波治疗;对照组给予局部痛点常规封闭治疗;通过对比两组治疗前后视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价远期疗效。结果:观察组治疗前VAS评分为(8.32±0.58)分,对照组为(8.19±1.01)分;观察组治疗24周后VAS评分为(0.21±0.22)分,对照组为(1.17±1.33)分。两组治疗24周后VAS评分比较,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论:放射状体外冲击波治疗鹅足肌腱炎远期疗效优于传统治疗。
Objective: To observe the long-term curative effect of extracorporeal shockwave on goose’s tendonitis. Methods: One hundred and sixty-six patients with goose-foot tendinitis clinically diagnosed were randomly divided into observation group (73 cases) and control group (73 cases). The observation group was treated with radial extracorporeal shock wave. The control group was given local closed point treatment. Scoring (VAS) to evaluate long-term efficacy. Results: The VAS score was (8.32 ± 0.58) in the observation group before treatment and (8.19 ± 1.01) in the control group. The VAS score was (0.21 ± 0.22) in the observation group and (1.17 ± 1.33) in the control group Minute. VAS scores of the two groups after 24 weeks of treatment were significantly different (P <0.05). Conclusion: Long-term curative effect of radial extracorporeal shock wave on goose tendonitis is better than traditional treatment.