论文部分内容阅读
任何具体行政行为都是行政机关以其法定职权作用于法律事实并做出法律结论的过程。对具体行政行为的事实认定和法律适用进行审查是行政诉讼的基本内容。尽管事实认定是使用法律的前提和基础,但法院和行政机关相比,在法律适用和事实认定上存在优势上的差异。法院对事实问题审查限度的把握及其具体标准,关系到审判权与行政权的配置和界限。本文通过对我国理论界有关事实问题审查理论主要观点及世界其他国家对此问题的相关规定的介绍,分析出影响事实问题审查的因素,并为正确理解该问题提出自己的观点。
Any specific administrative act is the process by which the administrative organ acts with its legal authority on legal facts and makes legal conclusions. It is the basic content of administrative litigation to examine the facts of specific administrative acts and the application of law. Despite the fact that facts are the premise and basis for the use of the law, there are advantages and disadvantages in the application of law and facts in comparison with the administrative organs. The court’s grasping of the examination limit of factual issues and its specific standards are related to the disposition and boundaries of judicial power and administrative power. This article analyzes the main factors that affect the review of factual issues in the theoretical circle of our country and the introduction of the relevant provisions of other countries in the world on this issue, and analyzes the factors that affect the review of factual issues and puts forward my own views for the correct understanding of the issue.