论文部分内容阅读
1905年12月18日流血冲突发生后,上海公堂案交涉发生逆转。两年的善后交涉,英国由被动转为主动,闭口不提事发原因及对死伤华民的抚恤,却执意索赔巨款,其他列强也附和讹诈。清政府和地方交涉大员先是据理力争,拒绝赔偿,继则欲折中通融,力求互赔免赔,均未果。最终被迫以前上海道袁树勋的名义赔款妥协结案。此案的后续交涉充分暴露出英国恃强凌弱的一贯作为,也折射出清季中国办理外交之辛酸艰难。
After the bloody conflict on December 18, 1905, the court case of Shanghai was reversed. Two years of aftermath negotiations, the United Kingdom from passive to active, not to mention the reasons for the silence and compassion for the casualties, but insisted on claiming huge sums, other powers also attach blackmail. Qing government and local negotiators first argue, refused to compensate, then you want compromise, trying to compensate each claim deductible, are unsuccessful. Eventually forced the previous Shanghai Road, Yuan Shu-hsun in the name of compensation settlement. Subsequent negotiations in this case have fully exposed the consistent behavior of Britain in bullying and bullying, and also reflected the hardship of handling diplomacy in the Qing Dynasty.