郑百文案件一度纷纷扬扬,仁者见仁,智者见智。个案本身已成为一个历史性的话题,但这是一个关于资本的权利问题,具有重要的意义。我们要问:资本拥有什么样的权利?资本的权利的边界在哪里?不同的资本是否拥有同样的权利?本文就此做一些讨论。一、权利的社会意义及其在当代社会中的限制当今社会是由权利构成的,在一般的私法关系中,权利是我们的基本工具。只是今天的“权利”意义已经不同。在民法传统中,权利具有绝对性。私法被确认为权利法,以此来促进私法的发展。但客观世界正在悄悄改变我们传统的知识,作为经济学家的科斯就在《社会成本问题》中专门研究了权利的法律界定及有关经济问题。在动态的权利领域,权利的样态与内涵更需要研究。在发生交互性活动、权利产生变动性影响时,传统的法律使用债权这种私法逻辑工具。但在社会关系愈来愈发达的过程中,权利内容还在扩张与限制(变动)。例如,证券性债权文书交换的发达,在不特 Zheng Baiwen case once flourishing, benevolent Jen, wisdom see wisdom. The case itself has become a historic topic, but it is a question about the right of capital and is of great significance. We want to ask: What kind of rights does capital own? Where is the boundary of the right of capital? Does the different capital have the same rights? This article does some discussion. I. THE SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE OF RIGHTS AND THEIR LIMITATIONS IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETIES Today’s society is made up of rights, which are our basic tools in general private-law relations. It is only today’s “rights” meaning has been different. In civil law tradition, rights are absolute. Private law is recognized as a law of rights in order to promote the development of private law. However, the objective world is quietly changing our traditional knowledge. As an economist, Coase specifically studied the legal definition of rights and related economic issues in the issue of “social cost.” In the field of dynamic rights, the style and content of rights need to be studied more. In the case of interactivity and the impact of changes in rights, the traditional law uses the logic of private law as a logic of private law. However, the content of rights is still being expanded and restricted (changed) in the process of more and more developed social relations. For example, the development of the exchange of securities claims documents is not unusual