论文部分内容阅读
序言:我们应该如何理性看待跨国界学术批评在本文上篇于2013年正式发表以后,笔者有幸读到了国内学者关于“新清史”评价的一系列最新论著。这些文章虽然切入视角各异,阐释观点也间有异同,但都对读者深入思考“新清史”学术话题起到了开阔眼界与整合思路的启迪作用,充分彰显出目前中国史学界百家争鸣的民主氛围和学人之间质疑辩难的求真精神。尤其像笔者这种非清
Preamble: How We Should Be Rational Thinking of Cross-Border Academic Criticism After the first part of this article was officially published in 2013, I was fortunate to have read a series of latest works by domestic scholars on the evaluation of “New Qing History.” Although these articles have different perspectives and explain similarities and differences, they both reflect on the readers deeply. The academic topics of “New Qing History” have enlightened the broad horizon and integrated thinking, which fully demonstrates that there is a hundred democratic contentions in Chinese historiography Atmosphere and scholars questioned the quest for truth. In particular, I like this non-Qing