下面一篇通报有人说写得好,有人说写得不怎么好。说好的人将它选为范文,用在自己编著出版的书中,加以赞扬;说不怎么好的人将它作为评改的对象,用在自己编著出版的书中,作为修改的案例。分歧的根源在于怎样看待有法和无法的关系。有法就是按统一规范的要求和格式行文,无法就是一切从实际出发,不拘泥于规范,善于根据具体语境的需要,灵活掌握和运用规范。下面首先看看这篇通报的 The following one briefing someone to write well, some people say that the writing is not very good. Those who are good choose it as a paraphrase and use it for complimenting in the book which it compiles and compiling itself; those who say it is not good use it as the object of reformation, and use it in their own book as a revised case. The root of the disagreement lies in how to view the relationship between law and lawlessness. The law is based on the requirements and format of a unified code, which can not be everything from the reality, not rigidly adhere to the norms, good at according to the needs of specific contexts, flexible grasp and use of norms. Let’s take a look at this briefing first