论文部分内容阅读
文学是人学,但应更多地关注“英雄”的生活,还是更多地关注普通人的生活?这个问题曾一度引起文学届人士的激烈争论,且两厢争执各行其道。至八十年代末九十年代初,从池莉的《烦恼人生》开始,一些谓之为新写实主义作家的作品不断推出,以关怀民生关注“过日子”为主调的作品大涌热浪,人们似一下子将视觉投向到人的生活的原生态。“过日子”一下子成为文学热点论题。文学写“过日子”是否反映了“生活的本质”?这给我们的文学理论家提出了挑战。
Literature is human science, but more attention should be paid to the life of “heroic” people or to more attention to the life of ordinary people. This issue once caused fierce debate among literary leaders and the hatchback disputes were going its own way. From the late 1980s to the early 1990s, starting with Chili’s Painful Life, a number of works written by neo-realist writers have been introduced continuously to cite Tai Lai’s heat wave, which is mainly concerned with livelihood concerns and “living the day” People suddenly turn their eyes to the original ecology of human life. “Lives ” suddenly became the hot topic of literature. Literary Writing “Live the Day ” reflects “the nature of life ”? This poses a challenge to our literary theorists.