论文部分内容阅读
三审制是在五十年代初确立下来的。1952年10月,出版总署公布了《关于国营出版社编辑机构及工作制度的规定》,为审稿的基本程序作了明确的规定。其第五条第一款指出:“一切采用的书稿应实行编辑初审、编辑室主任复审、总编辑终审和社长批准的编辑制度。”《规定》所要求的三审,是指对于“一切采用的书稿”。如果一部书稿,经过初审,认为不宜采用,再经编辑室主任复审,如同意初审意见,一般即作退稿处理,不再经总编终审。这就是说,对于不采用的书稿,一般只经二审。如果复审者不同意初审的退稿意见,而初审者坚持时,或者复审者认为有必要请总编裁决时,也可经由终审决定。对于采用稿,五、六十年代在实际工作中还不止三审。一般是四审:助理编辑初审、编辑复审、编辑室主任这一审称为复核,最后由总编辑决审——即终审。
The third trial system was established in the early 1950s. In October 1952, the General Administration of Press published “Provisions on Editing Institutions and Work Systems of State-run Publishing Houses”, which set out clearly the basic procedures for reviewers. The first paragraph of Article 5 states: “All the manuscripts used shall be subject to the editorial preliminary examination, the reviewer of the editor’s office, the final editor’s edict and the president’s approval of the editing system.” The “third” requirement of the “Provisions” Used manuscripts. " If a manuscript, after the first instance, that should not be adopted, and then reviewed by the chief editor of the room, such as agreeing the views of the first instance, the general is to be rejected for processing, no longer final. That is to say, for the manuscripts that are not used, they are usually only second instance. If the reviewer disagrees with the rejection opinion of the first instance and the preliminary reviewer insists, or the reviewer deems it necessary to ask the editor to decide, he may also decide through the final approval. For adoption, more than the third instance in actual work in the 1950s and 1960s. Generally the fourth trial: assistant editor first instance, editor review, editorial director of this trial as a review, and finally by the editor for trial - that final.