关于预防性战争存在国际法、道德哲学和法条主义范式三种研究方法,各类学者无视不同方法的存在,造成了各种研究自说自话、结论相互矛盾的混乱局面。在貌似公正的批评中,作者最终转向“凡现实的就是合理的”老套观点,以预防性战争频发为由,倾向于回归古典或神学传统的道德哲学方法,暗示应该修改国际法限制国家主权,进而为预防性战争打开大门。 There are three research methods of international law, moral philosophy and legalism paradigm about preventive war. All kinds of scholars ignore the existence of different methods, resulting in various chaotic situations with self-evident and contradictory conclusions. In seemingly fair criticisms, the author eventually turned to the old-fashioned view that “what is realistic is reasonable,” a moral philosophy that tends to return to the classical or theological tradition on the pretext of preventing frequent war, suggesting that the limits of international law should be amended National sovereignty, in turn, opens the door to a preventative war.