论文部分内容阅读
学校常用平均分、及格率、优秀率评价教学工作。随着九年义务教育的逐渐普及,单用这三个量数去评价教学工作是不够的,有时又是不可能的。本文就平均分的标准分在教学管理中的应用谈点不成熟的意见,供同行们参考。 一、问题的提出 考试过后,要进行分数统计,要对教师的教学工作进行评价,要对每个班级的学习质量进行分析。但由于年级的不同,所教科目的不同,各科试题难易程度的不同,单用平均分,及格率、优秀率去进行教学评价是不科学的,有些又是不可能的。比如期末统考中,一个学校六年级的语文平均分是84分,一年级语文的平均分是96分,我们能说一年级的语文教学比六年级的语文教学好吗?显然不能。又如,一个
The school commonly used average score, pass rate, excellent rate evaluation teaching work. With the gradual popularization of nine-year compulsory education, it is not enough and sometimes impossible to evaluate the teaching work alone with these three measures. This article on the average score of the standard points in the teaching management of immaculate talk about points for colleagues for reference. First, the question raised After the exam, to score statistics, teachers should evaluate the teaching work, to the quality of each class to analyze. However, due to the different grades, the subjects to be taught are different and the difficulty of different subjects is different, it is unscientific to use the average score, the passing rate and the excellent rate for teaching evaluation, and some are impossible. For example, in the final exams, the average grade of a Chinese at the sixth grade of a school is 84 and the average grade of a first-grade Chinese is 96. Can we say that the first grade of Chinese is better than the sixth grade of Chinese? Obviously not. Another example, one