论文部分内容阅读
清代嘉庆著名学者沈钦韩学问淹博,识见深广,所作大著《王荆公诗文沈氏注》,广引群书,旁采众说,是研读王安石诗文的极佳注本。然而其中也间或评说不当,偶有疏误。后学之人于此自当不需为其避讳,而应正本清源,以作补苴之说。其疏误之一,是在注释王诗《和王微之登高斋》时,说李壁注王微之为王皙为错,应该是王贽(《王荆公诗文沈氏注》,中华书局香港分局,1977年9月,页24)。对沈钦韩的这一个疏误,近年已有李之亮先生加以精彩辨说:此王微之实是王
In the Qing Dynasty, Jia Qin, a famous scholar, flooded with profound science and learned extensively. His book “Wang Jinggong’s Poems Shen Shi’s Note” was widely quoted and widely collected. It was an excellent note for studying Wang Anshi’s poetry. However, among them also comment or improper, occasionally mistakes. Those who later learned that they should not be their own taboo, but should be the original source, to make up those who say. One of the errors is that in commenting on Wang Zhi and Wang Wei’s ascendance, he said that Wang Xi was the fault of Wang Wei for Wang Wei, Wang Wei (“Wang Jinggong’s Poems Shen Shizhuo”, Zhonghua Book Company Hong Kong Branch, September 1977, p. 24). This mistake made by Shen Chin-han in recent years has been brilliantly discerned by Mr. Li Zhiliang: This Wang Wei is actually the king