论文部分内容阅读
2001年4月18日修正后的《婚姻法》首次提出了离婚损害赔偿制度。这一制度的确立,有利于保护离婚时无过错方的合法权益,制裁过错方的违法行为。它所表达的人道主义精神,以及对婚姻法中无辜受害的弱者所给予的深切同情和真诚帮助,无不折射出法律和道德的深度追求。但是实践中,本条文真正发挥作用的情况少之甚少。究其原因,一方面是列举式条文本身的局限性,另一方面是举证责任的问题。本文从适用范围、举证责任以及时效三个方面对离婚损害赔偿制度进行以下探究。
On April 18, 2001, the amended Marriage Law first proposed the system of compensation for damages for divorce. The establishment of this system is conducive to protecting the lawful rights and interests of the parties without fault at the time of divorce and the illegal acts of sanctioning the wrong party. The humanitarian spirit it expressed and its deep sympathy and sincere help to the innocent victims in the Marriage Law all reflect the deep pursuit of law and morality. However, in practice, there are very few cases where this article really works. The reason, on the one hand, is the limitations of the enumeration itself, on the other hand, the burden of proof. This article from the scope of application, the burden of proof and timeliness of the three divorce damages system to explore the following.