论文部分内容阅读
甲午中日战争中，济远舰管带方伯谦在黄海海战后被清廷“正法”，究竟是冤杀，还是罪有应得？对此，以往的史料中存在着截然相反的记载。一些论者根据新近发现的《卢氏甲午前后杂记》的有关记述，认为方伯谦被杀确系冤枉。本文认为：《卢氏甲午前后杂记》关于丰岛海战中的方伯谦和方伯谦被处死的记述，严重失实；关于黄海海战中的方伯谦的记述互相矛盾、漏洞百出。因此，《卢氏甲午前后杂记》非但没有为方伯谦“保船西驶”提供充足的证据，反而恰恰证明了方伯谦“临阵惊慌”、“仓皇脱逃”的可耻行径。
During the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895, Fang Boqian of Jiarui Shipyard was attacked by the Qing court for “Fa-rectification” after the Yellow Sea naval warfare. Is it an unjust kill or a crime deserved? In this regard, the historical data of the existence of the opposite record. Some commentators, according to the related account of the newly discovered “Lushi” before and after the incident, considered Fang Boxian to be killed unjustly. This article argues that the account of Fang Boqian and Fang Boqian who were executed in the miscellanies of Lushi’s Ancestral Apostles at the Toshima Island was seriously untrue. The account of Fang Boqian in the Yellow Sea naval battle was contradictory and full of loopholes. Therefore, the “Lushi” before and after “not only failed to Fang Baoqian” Paul sailing “provide sufficient evidence, but just proved Fang Boqian” panic “,” disobedient "shameful act.