在美国的法律中,夺回财产是免责特权的一种,是为了补充公力救济的不足而规定的一种自力救济的方式。与民法中体现的自助行为颇为相似,而自助行为虽然被世界各国认可,但是在中国民法上也是没有明确规定的,只是在现实生活中有大量的案例表明该私利救济的行为为人们所需要。夺回财产这项制度在现实生活中是否有存在的必要性,又如何最好的发挥其作用?接下来我将通过美国的一个案例,结合自己的所学和理解,阐述一下自己的看法。 In American law, the recapture of property is a kind of exemption from privilege and a form of self-help relief prescribed by the inadequacy of public remedies. It is quite similar to the self-service behavior embodied in the civil law. Although the self-help behavior is recognized by all the countries in the world, it is not clearly stipulated in the civil law of China, except that there are a large number of cases in real life that indicate that the private benefit relief is needed . Is it necessary for the system to be recaptured in real life and how best to play its part? I will elaborate my own opinion through a case in the United States, combined with what I have learned and understood.