楚辞原文的校勘是注释的基础工作,选择合适的底本则又是校勘的前提。蒋骥《山带阁注楚辞》与王夫之《楚辞通释》、戴震《屈原赋注》被誉为清代“鼎足而三”楚辞学著作,欲探讨其注释的学术背景,需首先考察所用底本。蒋骥《山带阁注楚辞·余论》序云:“余见闻甚尠,所阅前人批注,自汉王叔师《章句》,宋洪庆善《补注》、朱晦翁《集注》外,惟明莆田黄文焕维章之《听直》、衡阳王夫之姜斋之《通释》、嘉兴陆时雍昭仲之《疏》、周拱辰孟侯之《草木史》,本朝桐城钱澄之饮先之《诂》、丹阳贺宽瞻度之《饮骚》、莆田林云铭西仲之《灯》、嘉定张诗原雅之《贯》、宜兴徐丈焕龙友云之《洗髓》,约十余种。其间得失相参,别为分疏,兼抒未尽 The collation of the original works of Chu Ci is the basic work of annotation. Choosing the right one is the premise of collation. Jiang Ji’s ”Mountain Band Court Notes Chu Ci“ and Wang Fuzhi’s ”Chu Tong Express“, Dai Zhen’s ”Qu Yuan Fu Note“ is praised as the Qing Dynasty Need to first examine the base used. Jiang Ji ”mountain with Court Notes on the theory of Chu Song Yu“ On the cloud: ”I see very much, read the previous comment, since the Han Shu Zhang“ sentence ”, Song Hongqing good“ replenishment ” However, Putian Huang Wenhuan chapter of the “listening straight”, Hengyang Wang Fuzhi Jiang Zhaizhi “Tong Yan”, Jiaxing Lu Shi Yongzhao Zhong “Shu”, Zhou Gongchen Meng Houzhi “history of grass”, the capital of Tongcheng Qian Cheng drink first “诂 ”, Danyang He Zhanzheng’s“ drink Sao ”, Putian Lin Yunming Xi Zhong’s“ light ”, Jiading Zhang Shi Yuan Ya’s“ consistent ”, Yixing Xu Zhang Huan Longyou Yun“ wash marrow ”, during which gains and losses Participation, do not separate, and express unfinished