说来惭愧,上过苏联文学史的课却没听说过“拉普”。“拉普”两字还是在胡风先生的《我的自我批判》中第一次见到。他说拉普代表庸俗机械论,并痛切地感到它的危害。当时万炮齐轰“胡风反革命集团”,他的话我当然不能相信。拉普倒应是什么团体,进步的还是反动的我弄不清。以后也没弄清,运动接连不断,自身难保,哪儿还有心思研究拉普。再说想研究也没材料。一九八○年以后陆续看到有关拉普的材料和评论文章。对拉普的纲领、组织、活动有所了解,但仍有雾里观 Ashamed to say, on the history of the Soviet Union literature has never heard of “Lap.” The word “Lapu” was first seen in Mr. Hu Feng’s “My Critique of Self”. He said that Lapu represented the vulgar mechanistic theory and harshly felt its harm. At that time, the G-10 gunned “Hu Feng Counter-Revolutionary Group,” and of course I could not believe his words. What kind of group Raptivism should react to? Progress or reactionary I can not figure it out. After did not find out, the movement one after another, their own insurance, where there are thoughts Lapu. Say there is no material One after another from 1980 to see the material and comment on the article. Understand Raphael’s program, organization and activities, but still have a foggy view