论文部分内容阅读
界定了何为公共利益、取消了诉讼期间不停止执行补偿决定条款、确立了司法强制搬迁,是《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》的三大亮点,在这三个亮点背后存在公共利益内涵缺失依旧、诉讼期间是否停止执行补偿决定不明确、司法强制搬迁效果令人质疑的隐忧。为此,描述式公共利益内涵的引入、诉讼期间停止执行补偿决定的明确、司法强制搬迁的制度保障是克服《条例》亮点中隐忧的有益尝试。
Defined what is the public interest, cancel the litigation period does not stop the implementation of the provisions of the compensation decision, the establishment of the mandatory judicial relocation is the “State-owned Land Expropriation and Compensation Ordinance,” the three bright spots in the three bright spots behind the existence of public interest Lack of still, whether to stop during the implementation of the compensation decision is not clear, the mandatory relocation of justice is questionable worries. Therefore, the introduction of descriptive public interest connotation, the clear decision to stop the implementation of the compensation decision during the litigation period, and the system guarantee of judicial forced relocation are beneficial attempts to overcome the hidden worries in the “Regulations” highlights.