论文部分内容阅读
在对宪法权威来源这一重要宪法学命题的解读中,政治宪法学强调不成文宪法、政策与利益的权威性;宪法教义学强调价值和宪法文本的权威性。英国法理学家拉兹基于三个命题的“服务型”理论走一条不同于前人的权威阐释之路,给现代宪法学理论中关于宪法权威的讨论提供了一条介于事实和规范之间的新进路。宪法学作为一门理论性和实践性兼备的法律科学,既非重价值判断和价值选择的法伦理学,又非价值中立立足社会现实的法社会学。因此宪法权威理论的本质,乃是把“政治的宪法”与“文本的宪法”合二为一,在保持灵活性的同时不破坏价值性。从拉兹的权威理论所指示的方法论道路所得启示,有助于使我国宪法学研究摆脱事实与规范相脱节的尴尬困境,真正成为关切现实的规范学科。
In interpreting the important source of constitutional authority as an important constitutional issue, political constitutionalism emphasizes the authority of unwritten constitutions, policies and interests; constitutional doctrine emphasizes the value and the authority of constitutional texts. British jurisprudence Razz takes a different interpretation from the author’s predecessors on the basis of the three propositions of “service-type theory”, providing a discussion between constitutional theory and constitutional authority in a matter of facts and norms New way between. As a legal science with both theory and practice, constitutional law is neither legal ethics of value judgment nor value choice, nor sociology of law based on social reality. Therefore, the essence of the theory of constitutional authority is to combine the constitution of the political constitution with the constitution of the text, while maintaining the flexibility without destroying the value. The enlightenment from the methodology road indicated by Raz’s authoritative theory helps to make the study of constitutional law in our country get rid of the awkward predicament that the fact and the criterion are out of touch with each other and truly become the normative subject that concerns reality.