论文部分内容阅读
政治资金规管因侧重不同表现为不同的模式,包括以选举中心主义和政党中心主义为代表的重点规管模式和系统性全面规管模式。香港属于典型的重点规管模式,表现为“候选人中心主义”。收入的禁止和限制、公共补助、支出限制、财务申报等四大制度版块均围绕候选人为中心展开设计,规管目标集中在选举过程中。香港政治资金规管有独特之处,主要表现在接受捐助总额上限、候选人同意的支出控制这两个方面;但其规管体系也面临风险,主要表现为收入的禁止和限制版块比较薄弱、“软钱”问题、互联网参与竞选的冲击、日常政治资金(特别是政党资金)规管的空白。
Political capital regulation has different modes of performance due to different emphases, including the key regulation mode and the systematic comprehensive regulation mode represented by Electoralism and Party Centralism. Hong Kong is a typical key regulatory model, manifested as “candidate center ”. Prohibitions and restrictions on income, public subsidies, spending restrictions, financial reporting and other four major sections of the system are all designed around the candidate center, with regulatory objectives focused on the election process. The uniqueness of Hong Kong’s political capital regulation is mainly reflected in accepting the upper limit of the total amount of donations and the expenditure control agreed upon by the candidates. However, its regulatory system is also at risk, mainly because the banned and restricted income sections are relatively weak, The issue of “soft money”, the impact of the Internet on electioneering, and the regulatory gaps in daily political funds (especially party funds).