论文部分内容阅读
陈白沙的思想上承周敦颐、程颢、邵雍,而与程颐、朱熹不同。这个不同主要表现在对成圣境界——“孔颜乐处”理解的差异上。白沙糅合儒、庄、禅三家思想,在此基础上对上述命题进行了超越性阐释,以自适任情取代“孔颜乐处”的道德伦理内涵。这充分表现在他的生活实践方面。另外,白沙心学的超越性也体现出宋明理学本身的矛盾,揭示出理学到心学发展过程中的内在理路。
Chen Baisha’s thought of Zhou Dunyi, Cheng Hao, Shao Yong, and Cheng Yi, Zhu Xi different. This difference mainly manifests itself in the difference in the understanding of the state of sanctification - “Kong Yan”. Baisha blend Confucianism, Zhuang and Chan three ideas, on this basis, the transcendental interpretation of the above proposition to replace the “Kong Yan Le” ethical connotation. This is fully demonstrated in his life practice. In addition, the transcendence of Baisha psychology also reflects the contradictions of Neo-Confucianism itself and reveals the inner logic of the development of psychology in Neo-Confucianism.