论文部分内容阅读
《文学自由谈》一九九九年第三期第三十五页的一则卖书广告中,给笔者的一位旧知韩石山先生,上了一个“文坛刀客”的封号,看了着实令心惊肉颤了几秒钟。在同一期题为《这是巴金发现的吗?》的“钩沉”文章中,韩先生就萧乾在《新文学史料》一九七九年第二期上发表《鱼饵·论坛·阵地》一文,带头制造“巴金发现《雷雨》”的“神话”,进行了一番还算扎实的“钩沉”。令笔者不能心诚悦服的,首先是韩先生“文坛刀客”式的“钩沉”结论:“巴金发现《雷雨》这个神话,是萧乾制造出来的。《曹禺传》作者不仅不纠正,反而移花接木,使之发扬光大”;其次是他并没有能够从头道来,把萧乾与曹禺之间几十年的恩恩怨怨“钩沉”得明明白白。为还历史和历史人物以本来面目或本真面目,笔者只好自己动手“钩沉”一番。
In an advertisement published in the thirty-fifth page of “The Freedom of Literature” in the third issue of 1999, I gave an author’s old title, Mr. Han Shi Shan, a title of “Literary Knife” and read the book Frightened for a few seconds. In the same article titled “Is this what Ba Jin Discovered?”, Mr. Han published a paper entitled “Fishing Bait Forums” by Xiao Qian on the second issue of “History of New Literature” in 1979 Took the lead in creating the “myth” that “Ba Jin discovered the thunderstorm”, and carried out some fairly solid “hug”. The author of “Cao Yu Chuan” not only did not rectify, but instead wrote the myth that “the thunderstorm” was discovered by Mr. Ba Jin. "It is followed by his failure to come down from scratch and to understand the grudges and grievances of several decades between Xiao Qian and Cao Yu. For historical and historical figures to be the same or true, I had to do it yourself.