论文部分内容阅读
文化符号学中的标出性研究是一座还未被充分开发出来的学术富矿,以赵毅衡为代表的前辈们探讨了把正项、中项和标出项看作一个整体的相互关系,本文则进一步把正项、中项和标出项分列出来进行探讨,认为:一、标出项不全是被动标出的,还有一部分是积极标出。二、不被中项认同的积极标出是标出项中的标出项,多和行为人的初衷背道而驰,要想转变为标出项中的正项,行为人应该充分考虑上一层系统中的正项的群体心理。三、被中项认同的积极标出是标出项中的正项,他们在微观上,对标的翻转起着一定的发起和催化作用。
The study of the markedness in cultural semiotics is an academic rich mine that has not yet been fully developed. The predecessors represented by Zhao Yiheng explored the interrelationship of positive, intermediate and marked items as a whole. To further positive, middle and sub-items listed out to discuss, that: First, the marked incomplete is a passive mark, and some are actively marked. Second, positive identification is not identified by the middle item is marked in the marked items, and the original intention of the perpetrator runs counterfactually, in order to change to mark the positive, the perpetrator should give full consideration to the upper system In the positive group psychology. Third, positive identification by the middle item is the positive item in the item. In the microscopic view, they are certain to initiate and catalyze the turning over of the subject matter.