论文部分内容阅读
一、也说闵贞与“扬州八怪”时下闵贞是否应列入“扬州八怪”成为热点,持应将闵贞从“扬州八怪”中除名论点者之说被炒为“被开除”说。为此,近日扬州画派研究会和扬州日报举办了“‘扬州八怪’闵贞遭遇‘被开除’?”的学术研讨会。在这个会议上正方和反方争论得非常激烈。正方(闵贞应列入“扬州八怪”)势众,言之有理,而反方(不应列入“扬州八怪”)势孤,也不示弱,并祭出上世纪80年代《扬州八怪丛书》出版
First, also said Min Zhen and “Yangzhou eight strange ” now Min Zhen should be included “Yangzhou Bazai ” become a hot spot, holding Min Zhen from Was fired for “being fired ” said. To this end, the Yangzhou Painting School and the Yangzhou Daily recently held a symposium entitled “Yangzhou Baicai ’Min Zhen Encountered’ Was Expelled ’?”. At this meeting, the arguments between the pro parties and the opposition parties are very fierce. Square (Min Zhen should be included in the “Yangzhou Bazai ”) potential public, justified, and the other side (should not be included in the “Yangzhou eight strange”) potential or nor weakness, and resorted to the 1980s “ Yangzhou eight strange series ”published