论文部分内容阅读
我国《商标法》未明确规定认定商标侵权的标准,而是采用了举例的方式将商标侵权的表现形式作了列举。此种立法体例的优点是便于执法人员了解商标侵权行为,缺点是在遇到纷繁复杂的案件时,难于通过现象发现本质,进而认定是否构成侵权。再者,在行政执法和司法审判中,存在着一种误区,将商标侵权的表现形式作为认定商标侵权的标准。
China’s “Trademark Law” does not clearly stipulate the standard of trademark infringement. Rather, it uses an example to list the manifestations of trademark infringement. The advantage of such a legislative system is that it is convenient for law enforcement officials to understand the trademark infringement. The disadvantage is that it is difficult to find out the essence through the phenomenon and then determine whether it constitutes infringement in the face of numerous and complicated cases. Furthermore, there is a misunderstanding in administrative law enforcement and judicial adjudication, which takes the manifestation of trademark infringement as the standard of identifying trademark infringement.